Lender Defenses Against a Mortgage Lawsuit- So Why Settle?

Potential lender defenses against a mortgage lawsuit will include the following:

1- It was not the lender’s alleged misrepresentation (it was a misrepresentation by the buyer or independent appraiser) that caused the loan to go bad. It was not the lender, but the recession or housing collapse or the buyer lying about income, owner occupancy or the appraiser inflating the LTV. If the buyer lied about income, the lender made no “misrepresentation” on the loan. If the loan defaulted because the homeowner lost his job, the lender is off the hook. If housing prices in the whole area fell 30%, it will be hard to argue what the lender did on a specific loan caused that single loan to drop in value.

2- The argument cannot be “banks were irresponsible in lending and housing collapsed so they should pay”. That is not how the documents are drawn. Liability for each loan goes to the specific factors of each loan in the security.

So, then why settle if you are a lender?

1- Nothing in court is guaranteed
2- Litigation will take at a minimum 2-3 yr. or more and will be a cloud over the bank the entire time
3- Litigation costs will be huge
4- Settling puts a definitive dollar amount and timing of payments on everything

About Stout Law Firm

James Stout has practiced law in Orange County since 1995 and is highly regarded by the business community. He has passed three bar exams, California, Arizona and Nevada.
This entry was posted in Foreclosures Short Sales Mortgage Litigation, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s